It was a communication breakdown.
MySpace, Facebook, Friendster, Photobucket, Skype, AIM,
personal websites, e-mails—unavailable. All we could do
was relate to . . . each other.
Mere miles would not have hindered access to family and
friends—but between our schedule, a computer shortage and
the expense of overseas phone calls, the usual flow of
electronic communication slowed to a trickle. Sometimes, not
even that. At first, frustration crept in as people found their
usual connections curtailed. Nevertheless, 15 Jewish
believers (all but me college age) found ourselves eating,
studying, praying, worshiping, living and growing together for
nearly three months, first in Israel, then India. We’d gone for
discipleship, Jewish studies and outreach. In the process, we
became a community.*
IN “SECOND LIFE,” THE 3-D CYBER NETWORK, PEOPLE CREATE
COMPLETELY NEW IDENTITIES, INCLUDING NAME, GENDER,
LOOKS, CAREER—EVERYTHING.
E-communication definitely has benefits. The technology is
amazing. How else could you find people interested in
Kazakhstan, Johannine Theology and wine tasting? It’s easy
to invite others into your online world to share thoughts,
pictures, music and friends. Electronic photo albums, favorite
songs—even “wallpapers”—enable us to express ourselves
and our taste continually, and connect with those of like
interests. In “Second Life,” the 3-D cyber network, people
create completely new identities, including name, gender,
looks, career—everything.
The Internet also makes it easy for seekers to inquire about the
Bible or Jesus privately, from almost anywhere in the world, and
without fear of reproach. We should be all over the Internet
looking for creative ways to serve God and minister to people.
Our choice is not whether technology will affect our faith
communities, but how. And, as far-reaching as this
technology may be, it has limits. Will we take advantage of
the techno routes when and where possible, and look for
other avenues to take us where technology cannot go? Or
will we trust technology to help us do “virtually” everything?
Discipleship, for example, is an age-old concept. In the first
century, small societies of talmidim (disciples) sprang up
around certain sages. Pupils lived together, spent time talking
about all aspects of life, and especially how they might apply
the teachings of their particular teacher. Those disciples
committed themselves to their rabbis much
the same way as Y’shua’s followers
committed themselves to Him.
Being and making disciples for Y’shua is not
optional for those of us who believe and want
to obey Him. But are the ancient models still
relevant in light of all that technology can do?
As we think about Jewish believers in Y’shua today, there
may be many approaches to discipleship, but any successful
approach requires . . . (drum roll) . . . community. If
discipleship is tree-planting, community is the soil in which
those trees grow. And the depth of community in electronic
communities is limited. You get to maintain your contacts
with a maximum of personal control and convenience and a
minimum of cost and continuity—none of which is particularly
conducive to true community. Here’s why.
THE INTERNET CANNOT ADEQUATELY MEET OUR NEEDS IN THE AREA OF
DISCIPLESHIP BECAUSE IT CANNOT PROVIDE A LIVING EXAMPLE OF GODLY CHARACTER.
Control
We customize our online communities to tell as much or as
little about ourselves as we care to. We present ourselves as
we choose and perceive others as they choose. The amazing
level to which people can customize their virtual lives reflects
the value we place on personal choice and individual control.
But too often we control what is seen, while what is unseen
(our hearts) remains undisciplined and out of control.
Community is the classroom in which we learn to control our
impulses and reactions to situations and circumstances
beyond our control.
In real life and real community, personal choices are militated by
the needs and goals of the group, unforeseen circumstances,
and most of all, God’s will. Jesus set us a high water mark:
“Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me;
nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done” (Luke 22:42).
Convenient versus Costly Commitment
In virtual communities, we connect with people conveniently:
when and where we choose, with whom we choose and for
the duration we choose. Convenience relates to control as it
allows us to determine how much or little we will exert
ourselves, i.e. what cost we are willing to pay. Convenient
commitment is not real commitment, and without
commitment, there is no community and no discipleship.
Members of true communities don’t connect or disconnect
with the click of a mouse. We don’t usually get to handpick
who’s in our community any more than we handpick our
parents or our children. A variety of people come together and
are expected to “stick it out,” whether or not it’s convenient.
It is not convenience, but the annoying inability to have things
just as we please that brings out the best and worst in people,
and allows them to see one another as they truly are. Jesus never offered any bargains on the cost of discipleship.
He often required people to leave their possessions, their
professions, even their parents. He said,
“Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple”
(Luke 14:33).
Continuity
The Internet cannot adequately meet our needs in the area of
discipleship because it cannot provide a living example of godly
character. No doubt young believers can benefit from regular
interaction with more mature believers online, but a life of faith
is ultimately grasped through experiencing it lived out.
Relationships require continuity in order for a disciple to know
how theory is put into praxis. Lifestyle must be seen over
time to be believed and emulated.
Jesus demonstrated how to pray, how to dialogue with
antagonists, how to deal with death, how to demonstrate
God’s love to others and a myriad of other necessary skills.
He spent years with His disciples. When He said,
“This is My commandment, that you love one another as I have loved
you” (John 15:12),
He could point to His track record—the
disciples had experienced His love for them in various ways,
through various circumstances. He’d fed them, scolded them,
comforted them . . . and washed their feet.
The Massah Experience
Following Jesus and telling people about Him are
sometimes seen in juxtaposition, when really neither is
complete without the other—and community is so important
for both. I’m not saying that Massah, the Israel/India trip I
referred to earlier, is the only or even the best way to
approach these things. Messianic congregations are an
obvious context for combining discipleship and outreach in a
community context. I would love to hear examples of how
some of you are accomplishing this, and maybe we can
inspire and help each other. Meanwhile I wanted to offer a
snapshot of our “low-tech” experiment.
Massah was one of the longer “short-term” opportunities that
Jews for Jesus has offered. We’re still evaluating and
figuring it out, but I think it’s a program with a future. A
committed group of Jewish believers chose to spend their
summer learning to follow Y’shua more closely and sharing His
love with others away from the comforts of home. Careers
were put on hold, studies postponed, income sacrificed; family
commitments temporarily set aside. Each team member
sacrificed something to serve God with this group.
We spent so much time together that our lives opened up to
one another in meaningful ways. Deep discussions led to
prayer. People were challenged to examine and address
their issues in light of Jesus’ example and the examples of
fellow believers.
Our example wasn’t lost on the unbelievers we met. In India
for example, marijuana grew freely wherever we went, and
Israelis smoked it everywhere. They frequently commented
on how we didn’t smoke. At first they were puzzled, but most
came to recognize our commitment to God and to living in
purity (which is difficult in the absence of sobriety) as
something they could commend.
Much of our effort this past summer had to do with becoming
a team. On more than one occasion we discussed how
various group members would naturally have gravitated to
and become friends with one another, while others would
never have hung out together at all. We faced struggles and
breakthroughs and became a community of followers. The
struggles tested us in areas of weakness, and brought to light
things that God was dealing with in our lives. Ultimately, we
stood united in our love for Y’shua and in sharing that love
with others.
Talk Back
There’s no doubt that online social networks provide new and
creative ways for us to interact with one another. But a group
of committed believers is not nearly as powerful through
online networks as it is when people unite in person to do
something for God.
Being and making disciples of Y’shua is hands on work and it
requires commitment. It demands a personal example that
reflects the fruits of the Spirit, and a passion to serve God. It
requires a relational community where a believer can observe,
interact, try, fail and try again. True community isn’t always
convenient, and it may not reflect all our personal
preferences. It isn’t always fun nor does it always fit into our
schedules—but it’s essential for us both as individuals and as
a community of believers.
What do you think? Post your opinion on the web.
For now, you can write a comment on this article at
http://www.jewsforjesus.org/comments-vd
In the future, we hope to do more with Havurah online
and use the Internet to help share ideas. Why not take
advantage of the technology?
* This was our Massah (“Journey”) program—see details and
photos at http://www.jewsforjesus.org/join/massah_israel